enjoying (sacred) minimalism
Hi - yeah, the more I hear it the more I like it and think it's got potential. I agree that it'll sound more seamless after another one-on-one at Apple. More more!
Totally dig the electro-fried-sitar sound at the beginning... yes, very Jeff of me. Like the piece pretty well all around. A bit of stuff between :40 and 1:13 could drop out though: the higher pitched repeating sound; brushed symbols; the crisper, faster elements of the percussion are a bit busy under the, uh, what, synth solo?Yeah, dig it. A lot would be overkill, but that elecro-sitar thing, quite dig.
Jeff - So you don't like the little twitter? Oh well, I had kind of grown to like it. Well, I tried to make the "B" part more melodic since there really is no connected melody in the "A" part. Didn't work for you, huh? I think I need a broader, less intrusive melodic line, rather than what I have now. it does sound a bit too much like a "solo," which was not the goal. Thanks.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Hi - yeah, the more I hear it the more I like it and think it's got potential. I agree that it'll sound more seamless after another one-on-one at Apple. More more!
ReplyDeleteTotally dig the electro-fried-sitar sound at the beginning... yes, very Jeff of me. Like the piece pretty well all around. A bit of stuff between :40 and 1:13 could drop out though: the higher pitched repeating sound; brushed symbols; the crisper, faster elements of the percussion are a bit busy under the, uh, what, synth solo?
ReplyDeleteYeah, dig it. A lot would be overkill, but that elecro-sitar thing, quite dig.
Jeff - So you don't like the little twitter? Oh well, I had kind of grown to like it. Well, I tried to make the "B" part more melodic since there really is no connected melody in the "A" part. Didn't work for you, huh? I think I need a broader, less intrusive melodic line, rather than what I have now. it does sound a bit too much like a "solo," which was not the goal. Thanks.
ReplyDelete